So Boston’s new convention center wants taxpayers to help foot the bill for a new, 1,000 room hotel.
It’s in the Globe today – I wrote about this back in early December in my weekly column for B&T.
It’s pretty clear that if Boston’s already giant convention center is to nearly double in size, the city will need a lot more hotel rooms than it already has.
But as I predicted in my column, the convention authority’s angling for a new, publicly subsidized hotel could end up being the most controversial element of the whole proposal.
But there’s one obvious impact here that I don’t seeing getting explored, at least in the latest flurry of news on this issue.
Beyond whether it’s a good investment, there’s the issue of subjecting Boston’s already established hotels to unfair, subsidized competition.
The Westin Waterfront got built with all sorts of public infrastructure assistance but no direct hand out as is being eyed now. Yet this stirred up a fair amount of resent among Hub hoteliers.
So just imagine the reaction to millions in direct subsidies, including taxpayer-backed financing for a new, 1,000 room hotel.
When one hotel gets a generous helping of taxpayer subsidies, its competitors fear that it will undercut them rates and still come out ahead.
And the last time I looked, most Boston hotels are already struggling to get by in a tough economy, let alone having to deal with a hungry, new competitor on the block, paid for by you and me.
Didn’t the developer behind the W Boston just file for bankruptcy?
Given the stakes here for Boston’s hotel community, it will be interesting to see what kind of fight they put up.