Front Page
The Teller
Editorial and Opinion
Design Matters
Profile in Commerce
Banking & Lending
Breaking News
Commercial & Industrial
Residential Real Estate
By the Numbers
People
Real Estate Records
Credit Records
NATIONAL NEWS
Supplements
Browse
Back Issues
Records
Classifieds
Other Publications
Browse
Advertising Info
Article Reprints
Contact Us
Editorial Calendar
Newsstand Locations
 Issue of March 6, 2006 
   

Preserving Abutter Appeals of Chapter 40B Developments

DANIEL C. HILL
is an attorney with the law firm of Anderson & Kreiger LLP in Cambridge, and represents municipalities and abutters in Chapter 40B matters.
By Daniel C. Hill
In these editorial pages, attorney Benjamin Fierro, counsel for state’s homebuilder trade association, discussed two recent legal developments that could tighten the noose on abutter appeals of comprehensive permits under Chapter 40B (“A Very Unappealing Case,” Feb. 13 issue of Banker & Tradesman). First, a bill proposed by Sen. Harriett Chandler would impose a bond requirement on all appeals from adverse comprehensive permit decisions issued by local zoning boards.

Subscribers, click here to read entire story | Click here to purchase a subscription

 



Publishing Systems Powered By